Skip to content

HBASE-29081: Add HBase Read Replica Cluster feature#8044

Open
anmolnar wants to merge 45 commits intomasterfrom
HBASE-29081
Open

HBASE-29081: Add HBase Read Replica Cluster feature#8044
anmolnar wants to merge 45 commits intomasterfrom
HBASE-29081

Conversation

@anmolnar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@anmolnar anmolnar commented Apr 8, 2026

Hi all,

We would like to propose merging the feature “Read Replica Cluster” into
the main branch.

Background

We’d like to implement the open source version of Amazon’s Read Replica
Cluster on S3
feature for Apache HBase. It adds the ability of running
another HBase cluster on the same cloud storage location in read-only mode,
allowing users to share the read workload between multiple clusters. Due
to the characteristics of the implementation and the lack of automated
synchronization between the active and read-replica clusters, read replicas
are eventually consistent, hence they’re not suitable for reading most
recent data. However we still believe that users of open source Apache HBase
could take advantage of this feature and there are use cases out there which
read replicas could help with. Please find more information about the
feature in the linked blog post.

Pros

  • Running multiple clusters in different Availability Zones adds HA to the
    entire workload,
  • No need for data movement or duplication (active-active replication setup)
    which is cost and time efficient,
  • No limit for the number of read replica clusters

Cons

  • Read Replica clusters are eventually consistent: in memory data is not
    visible from read replicas,
  • Read Replica clusters must be manually refreshed: flush on active cluster,
    refresh hfiles/meta on read replicas

A detailed description of the design and implementation can be found in the
following document.

Apache HBase Read Replica Cluster Feature

Please review and share your feedback or comments.

Best regards,
Andor

Loading
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants